kaisersose
08-09 01:11 PM
My Lawyer said that the Premium Processing for I-140 will be again available from 08/16/2007, he said he knows that 100%. Did someone have some information about this ??. Can this be true??
No...but that is very interesting.
if this comes true, then please share this lawyer's name on these forums so that everyone can benefit from his/her info channel into the USCIS.
No...but that is very interesting.
if this comes true, then please share this lawyer's name on these forums so that everyone can benefit from his/her info channel into the USCIS.
wallpaper house Casey Anthony partying
matreen
08-22 06:39 PM
Hmmmmm....
How about this...
After you applied your 485 and work for the same company for 180 days, also you got your EAD. .....
Can someone change the employer afterwords (after 180 days) without worrying about H1B visa renewal/transfer?
If so what are the requirements....common guru's give us some hopes....
Thanks,
MS
How about this...
After you applied your 485 and work for the same company for 180 days, also you got your EAD. .....
Can someone change the employer afterwords (after 180 days) without worrying about H1B visa renewal/transfer?
If so what are the requirements....common guru's give us some hopes....
Thanks,
MS
add78
04-21 05:07 PM
Hello,
If someone is going to be filing for I-140 on a recently approved EB2 (India) while on H1-B in USA with same employer, is it better to check the first box (Alien will apply for visa at a consulate abroad - meaning consular processing of 485) instead of AOS? My understanding is once I-140 is approved and if 485 dates become current, then if CP has been indicated on I-140, then the consulate abroad will order visa number in the month after and the person should get an interview call, even if the dates retrogress back in the following months?
In that case indicating CP is better than AOS on I-140? If so, can the person continue to work on H-1 while waiting for the interview call at consulate abroad?
Thoughts appreciated. Anyone please?
Thanks
If someone is going to be filing for I-140 on a recently approved EB2 (India) while on H1-B in USA with same employer, is it better to check the first box (Alien will apply for visa at a consulate abroad - meaning consular processing of 485) instead of AOS? My understanding is once I-140 is approved and if 485 dates become current, then if CP has been indicated on I-140, then the consulate abroad will order visa number in the month after and the person should get an interview call, even if the dates retrogress back in the following months?
In that case indicating CP is better than AOS on I-140? If so, can the person continue to work on H-1 while waiting for the interview call at consulate abroad?
Thoughts appreciated. Anyone please?
Thanks
2011 casey anthony trial update
senk1s
05-14 12:20 AM
2 cent questions ...
Is NSC processing EB3s regularly?
TSC is not processing EB2s as well ... are they working on EB1s only?
Is it because the Visa #s are exhausted for the period?
Is NSC processing EB3s regularly?
TSC is not processing EB2s as well ... are they working on EB1s only?
Is it because the Visa #s are exhausted for the period?
more...
MYGC2008
02-25 02:57 PM
Transit Visa is Not Required in Frankfurt. Infact I had renewed passport with all pages blank. At the transit one officer asked me On what Visa are you travelling to US?
I said I have Advance Parole.That's all. The Officers are nice and friendly. They know it.
Infact I visited German Consulate at BOSTON before travelling. The Consulate General was extreemly good and told me "Not to waste money on transit visa"
I said I have Advance Parole.That's all. The Officers are nice and friendly. They know it.
Infact I visited German Consulate at BOSTON before travelling. The Consulate General was extreemly good and told me "Not to waste money on transit visa"
Blog Feeds
05-27 07:10 AM
On Thursday, May 14, 2009, Senator Diane Feinstein introduced a bill, nicknamed the “AgJobs Bill,” that seeks to grant amnesty for up to 1.35 million farm workers working in the country illegally, primarily in California. Feinstein and other legislators proposed the AgJobs Bill numerous times over the last decade but were met with fierce opposition. However, supporters of the bill – including the United Farm Workers of America and other worker advocates – are now hoping the legislation will become a legal reality under the Obama administration.
Generally, the AgJobs Bill would allow foreign farm workers who have been working illegally in the United States for at least two years to earn a path toward becoming legal permanent residents. Workers' family members would also be eligible for legal permanent residency, which could bring the number of legalized farm workers to approximately two million people. The bill would also focus on overhauling a program that aims to recruit foreign workers for seasonal jobs on American farms, where profitable construction jobs have tended to lure workers away.
For more information on Senator Feinstein and the AgJobs Bill, please visit: http://feinstein.senate.gov/public. For additional information on this news story, please visit: http://www.mercurynews.com/breakingnews/ci_12370678.
More... (http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Immigration-law-answers-blog/~3/1lsKxgHuaq4/)
Generally, the AgJobs Bill would allow foreign farm workers who have been working illegally in the United States for at least two years to earn a path toward becoming legal permanent residents. Workers' family members would also be eligible for legal permanent residency, which could bring the number of legalized farm workers to approximately two million people. The bill would also focus on overhauling a program that aims to recruit foreign workers for seasonal jobs on American farms, where profitable construction jobs have tended to lure workers away.
For more information on Senator Feinstein and the AgJobs Bill, please visit: http://feinstein.senate.gov/public. For additional information on this news story, please visit: http://www.mercurynews.com/breakingnews/ci_12370678.
More... (http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Immigration-law-answers-blog/~3/1lsKxgHuaq4/)
more...
gtg506p
01-07 10:24 AM
Had a quick question. Not sure if this has been discussed before. Planning to get wife here on H4 and she wants to study. I have applied for 485 and in retro now. Is it advisable to study on H4 or F1? I know she can work on F1 but would that not be advisable since lets say the VB does become current in future for me then filing her 485 might be a problem since F1 is pure non immigrant and USCIS might hold it againt her. Any info/simlar situations greatly appreciated.
Thanks
Amar
Thanks
Amar
2010 Casey Anthony listens to
rkoliparthi
08-07 09:47 PM
Hi Guys,
I have few questions.
I applied my Greencard under EB-3 Category and my labour was approved on Jul'2007. My priroity date is 25th June'2007.
Applied I140 & I485 concurrently and I140 was approved on Sep2007. Both myself and my wife got EAD's. Currently my wife is on EAD and still I am on H1-B.
Now I got another offer from fortune consulting company and I am planning to shift by using H1B transfer.
Steps to take care
Offer letter should contain same job title and same job duties. What else do I need to take care?
Some of my friends told not to submit AC21 and some of them told me to submit AC21 without fail.
Can my company withdraw my approved I140(was approved 2007) is it possible to do that?
Please let me know. I am in a very confused state weather to accept new offer or not.
Appreciate your comments.
Krishna
I have few questions.
I applied my Greencard under EB-3 Category and my labour was approved on Jul'2007. My priroity date is 25th June'2007.
Applied I140 & I485 concurrently and I140 was approved on Sep2007. Both myself and my wife got EAD's. Currently my wife is on EAD and still I am on H1-B.
Now I got another offer from fortune consulting company and I am planning to shift by using H1B transfer.
Steps to take care
Offer letter should contain same job title and same job duties. What else do I need to take care?
Some of my friends told not to submit AC21 and some of them told me to submit AC21 without fail.
Can my company withdraw my approved I140(was approved 2007) is it possible to do that?
Please let me know. I am in a very confused state weather to accept new offer or not.
Appreciate your comments.
Krishna
more...
MONCYS
03-20 11:42 PM
TSC online system is down. Any update on this ??
hair Image: Casey Anthony
Big Tom
07-05 08:34 PM
I just found this link (http://immigrationvoice.blogspot.com/) where this topic is already covered. Mods, please remove my post (and maybe it would make sense to create threads specific to the USCIS/DOS mess up to - at the moment it does not look very organized to me and it is hard to find information. Maybe sub-threads with "law suit", "publicity" would channel comments better?)
--------------------------------------
I only read about an article in two online newspapers but believe this whole topic should get significantly more attention. I do not know if that is going to help to get this started but I sent an e-mail to our local TV stations and hope that some may be interested and even pick it up. Again, no idea if this is going to work but I assume that if they get more e-mails regarding the same topic, interest will come up....
Tom
Hi,
With having many international operating companies in the U.S. who all employ legal alliens who are going through the "greencard process" to become legal permanent residents, the Department of State (DOS) and the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) have destroyed many plans, caused significant financial loss for applicants and very likely acted against the law. Here is an open letter from congresswoman Lofgren which explains the situation a little bit more detailed: http://lofgren.house.gov/PRArticle.aspx?NewsID=1808
I think this would be well worth a few minuted report - everybody is talking about the pain that the illegal immigrants go through but (without taking away anything from that), the pain of legal alliens having to deal with the willful behavior of USCIS and DOS is not much better.
If you would be interested in more information, I would be more than happy to help.
Best regards,
--------------------------------------
I only read about an article in two online newspapers but believe this whole topic should get significantly more attention. I do not know if that is going to help to get this started but I sent an e-mail to our local TV stations and hope that some may be interested and even pick it up. Again, no idea if this is going to work but I assume that if they get more e-mails regarding the same topic, interest will come up....
Tom
Hi,
With having many international operating companies in the U.S. who all employ legal alliens who are going through the "greencard process" to become legal permanent residents, the Department of State (DOS) and the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) have destroyed many plans, caused significant financial loss for applicants and very likely acted against the law. Here is an open letter from congresswoman Lofgren which explains the situation a little bit more detailed: http://lofgren.house.gov/PRArticle.aspx?NewsID=1808
I think this would be well worth a few minuted report - everybody is talking about the pain that the illegal immigrants go through but (without taking away anything from that), the pain of legal alliens having to deal with the willful behavior of USCIS and DOS is not much better.
If you would be interested in more information, I would be more than happy to help.
Best regards,
more...
bostonqa
06-14 09:05 AM
---I'm only talking in regards to FY-2007 in light of current development.---
Now that everything is current there would not be any need to per country quota. CORRECT?
Or since EB3 other is not current ("U") they cannot use AC21?
they have hinted retrogression in Sept for China, India, etc
Now if there is no per country quota, how can they retrogress EB for China, India, or any other country unless EB3 ROW is not current?
So unless they retrogress ROW, logically they should not retrogress at least EB2 for India, China and other countries
Now that everything is current there would not be any need to per country quota. CORRECT?
Or since EB3 other is not current ("U") they cannot use AC21?
they have hinted retrogression in Sept for China, India, etc
Now if there is no per country quota, how can they retrogress EB for China, India, or any other country unless EB3 ROW is not current?
So unless they retrogress ROW, logically they should not retrogress at least EB2 for India, China and other countries
hot that Casey Anthony lied
ronhira
06-08 11:41 AM
There is one way to find out if CIR is any good for EB - by looking at the bill when it is proposed bill and amendments. It will be suicidal to assume that CIR is somehow bad for us, and incriminate any effort for CIR. My point earlier was not that CIR is bad for EB, but about the actual reason for Sen. Reid's recent comments, just to set the expectations straight.
more...
house 2010 Casey Anthony Trial
mirage
07-10 11:12 AM
Guys,
AILF is seeking plantiffs. Please show some spine & courage. If your employment history and everything on your green card file is clean, volunteer for becoming plantiff. I have a gap in employment otherwise I would have surely volunteered.
AILF is seeking plantiffs. Please show some spine & courage. If your employment history and everything on your green card file is clean, volunteer for becoming plantiff. I have a gap in employment otherwise I would have surely volunteered.
tattoo PHOTOS: Casey Anthony And Her
newbie2020
07-20 07:22 AM
Have you filed your 485 during july fiasco, if yes then you have 180 days + after your 485 filed and you can move/port to any other employer
I have these below queries on Green card processing
My Green card processing background
My labor and I140 are approved and have priority date of May 2006 under EB3 category.
The reason for these questions is that I am planning to change the company that I am working with.
Questions.
1. Can I port the priority date (March 2006) when applying for new green card with new employer.
2. If possible to port the priority date can I apply under EB2 category assuming all other criteria satisfy for EB2 category and use the same (May 2006) priority date.
I have these below queries on Green card processing
My Green card processing background
My labor and I140 are approved and have priority date of May 2006 under EB3 category.
The reason for these questions is that I am planning to change the company that I am working with.
Questions.
1. Can I port the priority date (March 2006) when applying for new green card with new employer.
2. If possible to port the priority date can I apply under EB2 category assuming all other criteria satisfy for EB2 category and use the same (May 2006) priority date.
more...
pictures New Casey Anthony Party Pics
BMP
01-13 07:04 PM
Send him a letter by certified mail and then dump the bloodsucker ! Noncompete agreements are very dubious in the first place so I doublt the employer would try to reclaim the loss.
Also you can get a free initial consultation from a licensed lawyer, there are plenty of options here. At most he would charge you something around $200
Also you can get a free initial consultation from a licensed lawyer, there are plenty of options here. At most he would charge you something around $200
dresses Casey Anthony In Court
foobar2001
02-02 01:28 AM
Hello,
I am one of those cases where no one can get my name right. This time my visa stamp has an FNU against my first name.
I have a valid SSN, valid California DL and a valid California marriage certificate. The I-797 is not a blanket petition. It has my name as I wish it to be. I used my I-797 to get my DL couple of years back.
The question is, will the FNU create any problems at the port of entry? Will it create problems when I renew my H1-B later this year?
How would I enter my name on the I-94? As on the petition or as on the visa?
Thank you in advance.
i had the same issue on my visa. There were no problems at port of entry. Also, i used my real first name in every subsequent form in the US (i94, gc application etc), and have not faced any problems...good luck!
I am one of those cases where no one can get my name right. This time my visa stamp has an FNU against my first name.
I have a valid SSN, valid California DL and a valid California marriage certificate. The I-797 is not a blanket petition. It has my name as I wish it to be. I used my I-797 to get my DL couple of years back.
The question is, will the FNU create any problems at the port of entry? Will it create problems when I renew my H1-B later this year?
How would I enter my name on the I-94? As on the petition or as on the visa?
Thank you in advance.
i had the same issue on my visa. There were no problems at port of entry. Also, i used my real first name in every subsequent form in the US (i94, gc application etc), and have not faced any problems...good luck!
more...
makeup makeup Casey Anthony is
mach1343
09-24 05:04 PM
Hi Gurus,
Please suggest me the best option as i am still undecided.
My employer terminated my employment when I lost my job with the client company during 2nd week of June 2009. Before termination, my employer filed my GC and I have my EB2- 140 approved (PD- Feb 2007) and also My previous H1 extended last year 2008 and they have issued my visa for another 3 yrs (3rd term in H1). Since then I am without job and looking for an opportunity. But to be on safe side I left the country before the 30 days of my termination. I came back to US on H4 visa (so that I will be in-status and my GC won't get affected).
Now i am getting an opportunity for a FT position with a company and now I am undecided what to do? If I took the FT with a new company and then my GC process will start from beginning (applyng labor and then once approved (don't know how long it will take to approve labor in EB2) I can then file for 140 porting my previous approved 140 -eb2 with PD Feb 2007) or Just wait until I find a contract job and go through my previous employer and continue my GC process from where it is left.
Currently the PD for EB2-I is in 2005. So should I wait and go smoothly with my previous employer (but still we don't know how long it will take) or go with the FT.
Please suggest me.
i am badly need your advice.
Regards
Please suggest me the best option as i am still undecided.
My employer terminated my employment when I lost my job with the client company during 2nd week of June 2009. Before termination, my employer filed my GC and I have my EB2- 140 approved (PD- Feb 2007) and also My previous H1 extended last year 2008 and they have issued my visa for another 3 yrs (3rd term in H1). Since then I am without job and looking for an opportunity. But to be on safe side I left the country before the 30 days of my termination. I came back to US on H4 visa (so that I will be in-status and my GC won't get affected).
Now i am getting an opportunity for a FT position with a company and now I am undecided what to do? If I took the FT with a new company and then my GC process will start from beginning (applyng labor and then once approved (don't know how long it will take to approve labor in EB2) I can then file for 140 porting my previous approved 140 -eb2 with PD Feb 2007) or Just wait until I find a contract job and go through my previous employer and continue my GC process from where it is left.
Currently the PD for EB2-I is in 2005. So should I wait and go smoothly with my previous employer (but still we don't know how long it will take) or go with the FT.
Please suggest me.
i am badly need your advice.
Regards
girlfriend Casey Anthony is the Florida
fishjelly
09-08 08:03 PM
I am using asp.net to create web site...
Thanks for your help.
=)
Thanks for your help.
=)
hairstyles Casey Anthony waits in the
kdd
08-24 01:05 AM
Sorry, I wasn't very clear. I meant what's going on here:
public ComplexNumber( double real ):this( real, 0 )
What is ": this" doing after the function definition?
Thanks! :)
public ComplexNumber( double real ):this( real, 0 )
What is ": this" doing after the function definition?
Thanks! :)
bostonqa
06-14 09:05 AM
---I'm only talking in regards to FY-2007 in light of current development.---
Now that everything is current there would not be any need to per country quota. CORRECT?
Or since EB3 other is not current ("U") they cannot use AC21?
they have hinted retrogression in Sept for China, India, etc
Now if there is no per country quota, how can they retrogress EB for China, India, or any other country unless EB3 ROW is not current?
So unless they retrogress ROW, logically they should not retrogress at least EB2 for India, China and other countries
Now that everything is current there would not be any need to per country quota. CORRECT?
Or since EB3 other is not current ("U") they cannot use AC21?
they have hinted retrogression in Sept for China, India, etc
Now if there is no per country quota, how can they retrogress EB for China, India, or any other country unless EB3 ROW is not current?
So unless they retrogress ROW, logically they should not retrogress at least EB2 for India, China and other countries
lazycis
10-17 12:06 PM
Thank you! Hopefully 8c/page is not big money for me.
All you need is History/Documents report to check upon the status. So that's 8c per case. Opinions are free in PACER.
All you need is History/Documents report to check upon the status. So that's 8c per case. Opinions are free in PACER.
![[Valid RSS]](valid-rss-rogers.png "Validate my RSS feed")
No comments:
Post a Comment